An essay on the issues with the credibility of history in the classroom

However, the term "junior college" is now usually used to characterize private two-year institutions.

An essay on the issues with the credibility of history in the classroom

A slightly longer "nutshell" summary For the most part, Wikipedia has similar strengths and weaknesses to any other encyclopedia.

Keeps up to date well. You can ask questions. The history of an article and the process around how it was written are transparent. Articles vary wildly in quality and comprehensiveness. At any given moment, an article may be in a vandalized state rare, but not negligible.

Overview of Wikipedia In a wikiarticles are never "finished". They are continually edited and usually improved over time. In general this results in an upward trend of quality and a growing consensus over a fair and balanced representation of information. Users should be aware that not all articles are of encyclopedic quality from the start.

Indeed, many articles start out by giving one—perhaps not particularly evenhanded—view of the subject, and it is after a long process of discussion, debate, and argument that they gradually take on a consensus form.

Others may become caught up in a heavily unbalanced viewpoint and can take some time—months perhaps—to regain a better-balanced consensus. In part, this is because Wikipedia operates mainly on an informal process to resolve such issues. When editors cannot agree on content and approach, it is likely to take a bit of time before more experienced editors enter the picture.

Even then, on inherently controversial topics, those more experienced editors may have their own axes to grind. The ideal Wikipedia article is balanced, neutral, and encyclopedic, containing notable verifiable knowledge. Over time, an increasing number of articles have reached this standard.

However, this process can take months or years, as each user contributes in turn. Some articles contain statements and claims that have not yet been fully cited. Others will later have entire new sections added.

Reality Club Discussion

Some information now in the article may be considered by later contributors to be insufficiently founded and may be removed or expanded. While the overall trend is generally upward, it is not uniformly upward. It is important to use Wikipedia carefully if it is intended to be used as a research source.

Individual articles will, by the very nature of Wikipedia, vary in standard and maturity. This page is intended to help users and researchers do this effectively.

See also the article Reliability of Wikipediawhich summarizes third-party studies and assessments of Wikipedia. Notable strengths of Wikipedia Main page: Why Wikipedia is so great Wikipedia has certain advantages over other reference works.

An essay on the issues with the credibility of history in the classroom

Being web -based and having a very large number of active writers and editors, it provides fast coverage of many topics and provides hyperlinkingunavailable in traditional media. Also, it often provides access to subject matter that is otherwise inaccessible in non-native languages.

Since English Wikipedia editors come from all around the world, the relative lack of non-Western topics found in many Western publications is significantly less noticeable on Wikipedia. Wikipedia often produces excellent articles about newsworthy events within days of their occurrence, such as the Wimbledon ChampionshipsLal Masjid siegeKidnapping of Alan Johnstonor the Benoit family tragedy.

Similarly, it is one of the few sites on the web even attempting neutral, objective, encyclopedic coverage of popular culture, including television series or science fiction.

Pages - Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom

In comparison with most other web-based resources, Wikipedia's open approach tremendously increases the chances that any particular factual error or misleading statement will be promptly corrected. As Wikipedia is a collaborative, ongoing project, one may also ask questions of an article's authors.

And thanks to its extensive use of hyperlinks and external links, Wikipedia can be an excellent guide to other related material, both on and off Wiki. Notable weaknesses of Wikipedia Main page: Why Wikipedia is not so great Wikipedia's most dramatic weaknesses are closely associated with its greatest strengths.

Wikipedia's radical openness means that any given article may be, at any given moment, in a bad state: While blatant vandalism is usually easily spotted and rapidly corrected, Wikipedia is certainly more subject to subtle vandalism and deliberate factual errors than a typical reference work.

Also, much as Wikipedia can rapidly produce articles on timely topics, it is also subject to remarkable oversights and omissions. There is no systematic process to make sure that "obviously important" topics are written about, so at any given time Wikipedia may be wildly out of balance in the relative attention paid to two different topics.

For example, it is far more likely that the English-language Wikipedia will have at least some material about any given small U. Another closely-related issue is that particular Wikipedia articles or series of related articles are liable to be incomplete in ways that would be unusual in a more tightly-controlled reference work.

An essay on the issues with the credibility of history in the classroom

Sometimes this is obvious as with a stub article but other times it may be subtle:This essay delves deeply into the origins of the Vietnam War, critiques U.S. justifications for intervention, examines the brutal conduct of the war, and discusses the .

Many of the facts in this research reveal associations between education and variables like earnings.

You Might Like...

These relationships may be caused in part (or in whole) by factors that are related to education but not necessarily caused by education. has been an NCCRS member since October The mission of is to make education accessible to everyone, everywhere.

Students can save on their education by taking the online, self-paced courses and earn widely transferable college credit recommendations for a fraction of the cost of a traditional course. DEBATE AND STUDENT DEVELOPMENT IN THE HISTORY CLASSROOM 41 cultural literacy.

The goals also include development of the student’s abil-ity to read and write critically and analytically. Student development goals relate to the attainment of .

Oct 17,  · is one of the most accessed sources of specialized information on the Middle East and Muslim history, with over 69 million page views. Click on a course to see details about the course on top and compare it to others.

This Course List is meant to provide students with general information regarding available online courses.

Private Eye Field Reports and Lesson Ideas